🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.