🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming little “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a sizeable but guardian-like companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and moves like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a defunct facility, government authorities and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often overlooks the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the federal government blocked the transfer of the belugas to China, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to end their lives unless the government covers the expense of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has denied that demand, placing the 30 whales in an increasingly precarious position.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and group interactions point to they are deeply intelligent creatures – something Kristy Burgess discovered directly.

She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless amazed by the details and unique traits in their personalities. She developed a special affection for a pair of whales with contrasting natures.

“One whale selected me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “They altered the way I understand relationships.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a background of growing public opposition to their confinement.

During her time at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the facility attributes to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the inadequate care in which they were kept.

The facility did not operate to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and navigate with fragments in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but in the past stated: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and 24/7 attention than any individual in the Britain, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in early March following the passing of Eos, an sick beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the facility suspected information of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was fired soon after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” task, adding any efforts to put down even a one beluga would require “significant personnel”, equipment and machinery.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She backs requests for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In recent months, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to export the whales to China.

“Allowing the application would have meant a perpetual situation in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As the public, we know that belugas are meant for the wild, not in enclosures for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an transfer that would perpetuate the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reveal a more general misunderstanding of the facts of living conditions for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As decision makers attempt to find a solution, proposals have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. An idea called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of Canada’s north – where whales are a important part of food for Indigenous peoples.

A planned protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which has received official endorsement, has shown to be highly debated. The future location, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Proponents remain positive that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for eight of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the idea of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from captive facilities and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

The project lead, director of the sanctuary project, said the site will mimic the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|